Is this website an artistic piece or not? You are invited to state your position by clicking the switch below. Make sure you support it by commenting, because only clicks accompanied by a comment will be considered.

Write your comment

The only mandatory field is the statement itself. If you provide your email address, it will be used to inform you if/when your statement has been published (or the reason why it was not published). Your email address will not be displayed on the website nor will it be used for any other purpose.

Comments in favor

These are the 5 most recent comments supporting yes. Read all

  • ...

    Good question but i dont know are u asking about the website? are you asking about the piece within the website? I would say yes because i dont have any reason to deny, and no because no one can prove anything when it comes to defining an event or an object or a situation. So yes and no, but closer to the yes because I find it a special experience to be asked sth like this online

  • ...

    There‘s fucking ART in the title, i mean come on!

  • open definition

    I think one of the roles art can have in society – besides providing insights – is to provide a landscape where those insights can be exercised, or ‘played’. The art of debate is forgotten (think of social media trolls, polarization, etc) and imho this is a good exercise on bringing it to the playing field again.

    As long as the definition remains open, i.e., there is not a ‘final conclusion’ where the answer shall be revealed, this can be considered art.

  • Changed my mind

    After reading the comments that support ‘no’, I changed my mind.

    Its content is void, it proposes nothing. It’s empty, silly and ugly. (comment 34)

    Isn’t this a perfect description of how most of us are living our lives?

  • Yes

    Yes, because it does not matter.

Comments against

These are the 5 most recent comments supporting no. Read all

  • No talent

    Art requires talent. Art is a well done drawing, a well composed or well played piece of music. I do not know what this is, but it is definitely not art.

  • Audience does not define what art is or not

    This definition should be done by the artist, not by the audience. It is therefore nor art.

  • 34

    It simply isn’t. Its content is void, it proposes nothing. It’s empty, silly and ugly.

  • 14

    This could not be more distant from what art is supposed to be. It is nothing.